Supplementary Exercise 3.95 of IPS7e ------------------------------------ A study on processing of potatoes into french fries. It is of interest to examine whether the storage and cooking affect flavour and taste. (a) The components of the experimental design are as follows: experimental unit: batch of french fries processed in the same way presented to the taster response variables: ratings for colour and flavour of the fries factors: storage (none/fresh, 1 month at room temp, 1 month refrigerated) cooking delay (none/immediately after slicing, 1 hour) treatments: each of the six combinations of storage and cooking delay The role of the tasters is discussed under (c). (b) As described above, the experiment is a completely randomized design with 6 treatments from factorial combinations of two factors. We could say it is a two-factor completely randomized design. Randomization would consist simply in randomly assigning batches of potatoes (corresponding to the servings of french fries presented to the tasters) to the six treatments. A totally random allocation would be easiest if the total number of potatoes was known or decided in advance. If the number of potatoes is not known, a possible alternative to a totally random sampling (of potatoes) is a systematic random sampling (slide 2L-12, Exercise 3.66 of IPS7e; 3.64 of IPS6e, 3.47 of IPS5e), whereby the first six potatoes are randomly assigned to the 6 treatments and this pattern is repeated until all potatoes have been assigned. (c) So far the experimental design has not included any mention of the tasting and the visual scores assigned by tasters (a taster is a person specifically trained to detect difference in taste between different products of the same type). Multiple tasters will be needed to ensure adequate replication and to broaden scope of the study (if the scores were only given by one person, the results may not be representative for anything but this person's preferences). Each taster may be presented with a batch of fries for each of the 6 treatments only once or multiple times. As the scores by the same taster can be expected to be more similar than scores from the different tasters, the tasters can be viewed as a blocking factor. Thus, the design becomes a completely randomized two-factor block design. In addition to the randomization of the potatoes, we also need to randomize the order in which each taster is presented with the different batches of fries. We can label the treatments 1-6 and use a random rearrangement of the numbers 1-6 to decide the order. For example, using Minitab we could get the following order (for one taster; the orders should not be the same for all tasters): MTB > Set c1 DATA> 1( 1 : 6 / 1 )1 DATA> End. MTB > Sample 6 C1 c2. MTB > Print C1 C2. Data Display Row C1 C2 1 1 4 2 2 2 3 3 5 4 4 1 5 5 6 6 6 3 So this taster would be presented with treatment 4 first, then treatment 2, and so on.